![]() 03/11/2016 at 18:03 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I’ve been modeling a cornet for my final project, !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
Musicians of Oppo, can you name the part pictured above? (Almost finished)
![]() 03/11/2016 at 18:05 |
|
I’ll name it Larry.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 18:09 |
|
its thing you slide to do things
![]() 03/11/2016 at 18:25 |
|
I believe the proper engineering term for it is “that bendy tuby thing with an adapter plug coming out of the bottom”.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 18:34 |
|
Valve slide? I dunno, I was a drummer.
How did you manage so many operations for that one part? *mind blown* Or are there internal things happening? But then why aren’t they separate pieces? And why is there only a hole on one tab, not both? And why isnt that a 5 piece assembly? Ahhhhh!
![]() 03/11/2016 at 18:37 |
|
All I see is a form of potato cannon.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 19:17 |
|
p trap for a sink?
![]() 03/11/2016 at 19:46 |
|
jet butt?
![]() 03/11/2016 at 19:48 |
|
That’d be a tuning slide.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:02 |
|
YES.
Which valve though?
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:02 |
|
k
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:02 |
|
sure
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:02 |
|
Pretty much.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:02 |
|
Not a potato cannon.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:03 |
|
It’s all one piece.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:03 |
|
3rd slide valve. It helps that you left the tree open so that we can see you named the part valve3-slide.sldprt ;)
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:04 |
|
Damn, well yes.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:04 |
|
No.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:05 |
|
Valve number one, or the one closest to you.
(I played various brass instruments for 5 years in highschool)
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:10 |
|
Wrong. 3.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:12 |
|
Putting the hole on one tab is actually pretty easy - you just click on the tab surface to make a sketch plane, sketch a circle on the tab, make an extruded cut and tell it “up to next” and SolidWorks just cuts to the next surface.
But yeah there is a lot going on here for a single part. Maybe class requirements to demonstrate a bunch of operations that were taught?
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:15 |
|
Was the swept cut a class requirement? It seems like it would have been easier to just sketch a ring and do a swept extrusion of that. Or is there something internal to the part that I'm missing?
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:15 |
|
crap. I was thinking about a trumpet.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:17 |
|
I know you’re a student, so I wasn’t trying to be a dick btw. But given that list of steps it could be a lot simpler.
Good luck on the project. If you hit a roadblock, I’m sure I’m one of many SW users around here that can help.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:18 |
|
Show us the final assembly when it’s done. Looking at the cornet in your other post it should be pretty damn impressive! Way more ambitious than anything I've done with SolidWorks.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:21 |
|
Probably.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:26 |
|
I would have thought the actual real world part would have been symmetrical. I was trying to figure out why his design wasn’t. But good point about operations potentially being required/demonstrated in order to pass the class.
I have more combined hours in AutoCAD, IDEAS, UG/NX, ProE, SolidEdge, and SW than I care to count. ProE is the best and I’ll fight anyone that disagrees.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:41 |
|
Makes sense - misunderstood what you were asking sorry.
I learned solid modeling on Pro/E back in 2004. I remember hating it so much at the start but defending it in the end for all of the things I hated at the start. I lived in Europe in 2005 and had to learn CATIA and couldn’t stand it compared to Pro/E.
We mostly use SW where I work now, so I’ve learned to live with it and it’s basically all I’ve used for 8 years or so now. Didn’t Pro/E become Creo a few years back? We have a couple Creo licenses around and they seem to use the same versioned file extensions as Pro/E did back in the day. All I ever do with it is open models from our customers and either make measurements or export the parts as IGES files to open in other software.
![]() 03/11/2016 at 20:54 |
|
No biggie, adter re-reading it, the comment didn’t come across well at all via the internet.
I keep forgeting it’s Creo now. We kept calling it ProE after the tranition. Impressive, that’s a lot of time on one platform. I hopped around and ended up getting seat time with everything but CATIA. I’ve heard mixed reviews with it.
![]() 03/12/2016 at 02:07 |
|
i miss SW.
![]() 03/12/2016 at 02:20 |
|
I started learning Solidworks after having been using Inventor. It’s like a breath of fresh air after having been left outside in a sandstorm.
![]() 03/12/2016 at 08:02 |
|
It’s a part of a trombone.
![]() 03/12/2016 at 08:03 |
|
Is that a Stef Schrader valve I see?
![]() 03/12/2016 at 11:40 |
|
Once you finish the model, you need to run some CFD through it... probably would be really interesting, actually.
![]() 03/12/2016 at 13:15 |
|
Yes......
![]() 03/12/2016 at 13:16 |
|
Well, in the hands of some people, maybe. Or a clam cannon.
![]() 03/12/2016 at 13:18 |
|
Spit cannon.
![]() 03/12/2016 at 13:20 |
|
Said to every parent of a trumpet student: “It’s not spit. It’s water . No, really!”